
Blog 6 23rd July 2011
Throbbingly aching feet, from twelve hours standing on them or marching around the property yesterday, were going to be no reason to be “excused duty” today – not that I’d have missed it for the world.
This was always going to the busier of the two days of this first part of the project, even before a much sunnier day dawned. The splendid redcoated re-enactors of Pulteney’s regiment of the Lace Wars society were guaranteed to bring in lots of visitors, in addition to the following we’re already building up online and by word of mouth. I have previously had my reservations about using re-enactors at archaeological events – occasionally they can just be an easy, popularist “fix” to enliven an event while having only limited relevance with the archaeological project itself. However, given both William Aislabie’s role in running the army, and the reports that the Quebec was used in the 18th century to commemorate the battle, the presence of Redcoats today was entirely relevant and fitting to the site. So much for theory – the more relevant practice is that the five of them looked absolutely splendid, really brought the gardens to life, and were brilliant interacting with visitors. We couldn’t have asked for more.
The archaeological aspects of the project also moved into top gear. Ciceley and Robert from Field Archaeology Specialists continued the survey of the interior of the site, regularly interrupted by entrants in “Mr Aislabie’s Patriotic Challenge”. Initially named “Pin the Island on the Garden”, this was a family activity, using copies of the historic mapping to invite young archaeologists to spy out the positions of the French harbour and British gun battery. The family with the closest guess will win a VIP behind the scenes visit to the estate, and lunch as Mr Aislabie’s guests.
Our first archaeological results really started taking shape today. The surface topography of the site really isn’t what might have been expected, and there’s certainly no clear trace of the central large island. This raises a concerning possibility. We’ve been assuming that the pond was simply filled in 1900, implying that the archaeology of the original features should survive relatively untouched, buried beneath the filling layers. But the absence of any sign of the island now raises the possibility that it had its top sliced off, to provide soil for infilling the pond. This is only a possibility at present, one that we’ll need to explore further in September. It’s worth noting, though, that the large Scot’s pine in the centre of the site survived the slicing (if that’s what happened) and it’s hard to see how it could have done so and continued growing happily. I had been assuming that the pine was C18 in date (there are others of that vintage at Studley) but Michael Ridsdale (Head of Landscape) advises that its nineteenth century – though it’s harder to date trees accurately when they’re rooted in waterlogged soil. (The conditions are less favourable and that can slow down growth a lot). Cicely and Robert have now finished their mapping of the trees, so that we can accurately relate the present stock to the position of the islands, which should help with dating.
Elsewhere it looks like the surface undulates fairly irregularly, reflecting the area’s, shall we say “unceremonious” handling in the past century, rather than the remains of anything earlier. However, it’s worth waiting until the topographical survey results are processed and printed out – there may just be subtler features surviving that we didn’t spot on the ground.
Ciceley also produced a first overlay plot of the different historic mappings. It was great fun showing visitors the various historic maps (hand drawn ones of 1831, 1838 and 1870, as well as the OS depictions of 1854, 1892 and 1909) and getting their agreement that they all showed the same arrangement of ponds and islands. One then produced, with a flourish, the overlay plot, showing how very different each representation was from any of the others when it came to precise details. Millimetres of variation on the plans represent metres of variation on the ground – underlining the importance of obtaining the most accurate survey information possible, and then backing it up through excavation – be that to inform restoration or other conservation management of the site.
All in all, this weekend was a great start to the project proper. Like the breeze whipping away the gunpowder smoke from the Redcoats, some of the mists of time have started to thin over the Quebec. Next we’ll need to process the data collected on the last couple of days, and use it to decide on the locations of the trenches that we’ll open in September. Meanwhile, there’s supporting Tessa Goldsmith in the last stages preparing the “Rubbing shoulders with Georgians” exhibition, due to open on the site in August. This weekend’s experience were also really useful for finding out exactly how well the entrances and exits work, knowledge we can build into the final design of the exhibition.
Many, many, thanks to everyone on the staff at Fountains Abbey and Studley Royal, and to the members of the Lace Wars Society, for working so hard to make the Festival of British Archaeology events at the Quebec such a success.
